Confirmed recordArticle · 2026 · Uzbek

RAQAMLI VA QOG'OZ FORMATDAGI MATNLARNI O'QIB TUSHUNISH, DIQQAT VA LUG'AT O'ZLASHTIRISHNING QIYOSIY TAHLILI

Eshonkulova Hilola Rajab qizi

DRI identifier
20.1000/mtv/2026/i5/31815067
Go to the original

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada xorijiy ilmiy tadqiqotlar tahlili asosida raqamli (ekran orqali) va qog'oz formatdagi matnlarni o'qishning o'qib tushunish, diqqatni boshqarish va lug'at o'zlash tirish jarayonlariga ta' siri qiyosiy o'rganilgan. Tahlillar shuni ko'rsatadiki, qog'ozda o'qish, ay niqsa murakkab va axborotli matnlarni hamda vaqt cheklangan vaziyatlarda o'qib tushunish bo'yicha ustunlikka ega. Ekran orqali o'qishda esa diqqat ning chalg'ishi, yuzaki qayta ishlash va metakogni tiv xatoliklar (o'z tushunchasini ortiqcha baholash) ko'proq kuzatiladi. Shu bilan birga, raqamli o'qish samaradorligi matn mazmuniga mos interaktiv elementlar, o'rinli qo'llanilgan lug'at vositalari va ayniqsa kattalar ya'ni o'qituvchi yoki otaona tomo nidan ko'rsatiladigan pedagogik qo'llabquvvatlash mavjud bo'lganda sezilarli darajada oshishi mum kin. Maqola yakunida boshlang'ich ta'lim amaliyoti uchun oltita metodik tavsiya ishlab chiqilgan.

  • ekran orqali o'qish
  • qog'ozda o'qish
  • o'qib tushunish
  • diqqat
  • metakognitiv nazo rat
  • boshlang'ich ta'lim
  • o'qish savodxonligi

Bibliographic details

Publication typeResearch article
SourceMaktab ta’limi: muammolar, izlanishlar, yechimlar (journal)
Volume, issue, pages2026, no. 5
Publication date2026
Publication languageUzbek
InstitutionAbdulla avloniy 20.1000
Original addressjournal.avloniy.uz/uz/article/raqamlivaqogozformatdagimatnlarnioqibtushunishdiqqatvalugatozlashtirishningqiyosiytahlili-336
Record created17 Sept 2026, 10:55
Last updated17 Sept 2026, 10:55

Authors

Eshonkulova Hilola Rajab qizi

Authors are listed in the order of the original publication.

References

  1. V .Clinton. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and metaanalysis // Journal of Research in Reading. – 2019. – V ol. 42(2). – P. 288325. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/14679817.12269
  2. P.Delgado, C.Vargas, R.Ackerman, L.Salmerón. Don't throw away your printed books: A metaa - nalysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension // Educational Research Review. – 2018. – V ol. 25. – P. 2338. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
  3. R.Ackerman, T.Lauterman. Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A meta - cognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure // Computers in Human Behavior . – 2012. – V ol. 28. – P. 18161828. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
  4. T.Lauterman, R.Ackerman Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2014. – V ol. 35. – P. 455463. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
  5. S.Feng, S.D'Mello, A.Graesser. Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts // Psychono mic Bulletin & Review. – 2013. – V ol. 20. – P. 586592. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s134230120367y
  6. N.S.Baron. Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  7. L.E.Annisette, K.D.Lafreniere. Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis // Personality and Individual Differences. – 2017. – V ol. 115. – P. 154158. – DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
  8. Z.K.Takacs, E.K.Swart, A.G.Bus. Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technologyenhanced storybooks: A metaanalysis // Review of Educational Research. – 2015. – V ol. 85(4). – P. 698739. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
  9. J.ParishMorris, N.Mahajan, K.HirshPasek, R.M.Golinkoff, M.F.Collins. Once upon a time: Parentchild dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era // Mind, Brain, and Education. – 2013. – V ol. 7(3). – P. 200211. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12028
  10. R.E.Mayer Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  11. O.Korat, T.Graister, C.Altman. Contribution of reading an ebook with a dictionary to word learning // Journal of Communication Disorders. – 2019. – V ol. 79. – P. 90102. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcomdis.2019.03.004
  12. A.G.Bus, M.H.van IJzendoorn, A.D.Pellegrini Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A metaanalysis // Review of Educational Research. – 1995. – V ol. 65(1). – P. 121. – DOI: https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543065001001
  13. A.C.Hargrave, M.Sénéchal. A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies // Early Childhood Research Quarterly. – 2000. – V ol. 15(1). – P. 7590. – DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/S08852006(99)000381
  14. S.Rvachew, K.Rees, E.Carolan, A. Nadig Improving emergent literacy with schoolbased shared reading // International Journal of ChildComputer Interaction. – 2017. – V ol. 12. – P. 2429. – DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.01.002
  15. A.Shamir, O.Korat, R.Fellah Promoting vocabulary and literacy among children at risk // Reading and Writing. – 2012. – V ol. 25(1). – P. 4569. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s111450109247x
  16. O.D.Rustambekova. Digital reading vs. print reading: effects on EFL learners' reading speed and understanding // International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. – 2025. – No. 11. – P. 639643.

The passport page is public. The PDF is not: the right to republish it may not exist.